Everyone’s talking about artificial general intelligence (AGI) like it’s a math problem. Like if we just get the algorithms right, the whole world will change. But here’s the truth no one wants to face: AGI won’t fail because it’s dumb. It’ll fail because it’s hungry, and we can’t feed it.
This isn’t a software problem. It’s an energy crisis.
🧠 If this resonates, read my earlier piece: The AI Gold Rush Is Over where I explain why AGI is no longer a research problem, but a resource war
The Illusion of Infinite Compute
For the last decade, we’ve tricked ourselves. We treated compute like it was infinite. New chips every year, cloud credits handed out like candy, startups burning hundreds of GPU-hours on anime filters and chat apps.
But training GPT-4 took 1.3 gigawatt-hours. The same energy needed to power 1,000 homes for a month. That’s 1 model. 1 run. The subsidies will stop.
Now scale that to real-time AGI:
Millions of concurrent agents
24/7 inference
Embedded cognition in homes, cars, offices, drones, factories
This is a national grid-scale demand. Thousands of GWh per month, per frontier model, running live.
GDP vs Reality
Zoom out. Here’s the macro picture:
GDP-to-debt ratios are collapsing across the developed world
Boomers are retiring
Fertility is crashing
Labor costs are soaring
Productivity is stagnant
We can’t tax our way out. We can’t inflate our way out. We can’t grow our way out.
The only thing that pencils out is non-human labor. Automation at scale. And fast.
This connects directly to the thesis I laid out before: AGI is an economic necessity. The system collapses without it.
But all that automation needs power. Real power.
Solar Isn’t Serious — Except Maybe for Elon
Let’s kill the dream gently. Solar is fine for homes, for daytime offsets, for feel-good ESG slides. But for powering AGI? It’s not enough.
Problem 1: Intermittency Solar gives you 5-6 good hours a day. AI workloads want 24/7 uptime. So now you need massive battery storage: expensive, inefficient, and highly dependent on rare earths.
Problem 2: Footprint Want to run a hyperscale cluster on solar? You need square kilometers of panels. That’s before batteries. You’re buying real estate, building new transmission lines, and praying for sun.
Problem 3: Energy Density Solar panels: ~200W per square meter. Nuclear is 1,000x that.
So unless you’re planning to cover Nevada in silicon, solar isn’t not enough.
And yet… Elon Musk has been bullish on solar since at least 2022. In his words:

Recently, he’s escalated:
Solar power is very obviously the future if you can do elementary math.
Compared to the Sun, all other energy combined is like caveman burning some twigs.
— #Elon Musk (#@elonmusk)
11:12 AM • May 23, 2025
And just last year, he revealed the real frame he’s operating from:
As we progress along the Kardashev Scale, energy harnessed on Earth will increase a hundredfold and will mostly be solar aka fusion aka starlight.
Then energy harnessed will increase perhaps a billionfold if we make it to Kardashev II, with space solar power, and another
— #Elon Musk (#@elonmusk)
8:43 AM • May 12, 2025
He’s not just thinking about solar farms. He’s thinking Dyson Sphere-adjacent.
Musk’s Texas Bigger Game
In fact, Musk has done the math. As he put it:
One square mile on the surface receives ~2.5 Gigawatts of solar energy. That’s Gigawatts with a “G”. It’s ~30% higher in space. The Starlink global satellite network is entirely solar/battery powered.
Factoring in solar panel efficiency (25%), packing density (80%) and usable
— #Elon Musk (#@elonmusk)
11:06 PM • Sep 26, 2024
But not everyone agrees. Yann LeCun, one of Musk’s most vocal critics, fired back:
Yeah, lots of people have done this calculation.
The main problem is that it's totally impractical unless you have tens of GWh of storage capacity to survive through the nights and cloudy skies.
What existing energy storage technology can scale to that level and still remain
— #Yann LeCun (#@ylecun)
6:29 PM • Sep 27, 2024
The irony is that Musk is in the business of solving that exact problem. Batteries. Lots of them. He’s not hand-waving storage away: he’s quietly building the supply chain to close that gap.
Whatever delivers reliable, scalable energy fastest wins. Whether it’s fusion in orbit or uranium underground.
Musk says you can power the U.S. with solar in a small corner of Texas. And he’s not wrong, on paper.
Yes, the math works. 10,000 square miles of panels could technically generate enough electricity.
But Musk’s model is handwaving the real world:
Transmission is broken. The U.S. grid can’t move that power coast to coast.
Storage isn’t solved. Battery tech isn’t even close to what’s needed.
Uptime matters. AGI workloads don’t tolerate variance.
Land use and cooling are nightmares. Solar doesn’t help with thermal overhead.
It’s a fantasy built for spreadsheets, unless Musk knows something we don’t. Maybe he does.
He’s publicly called space-based solar power (SBSP) "one of the dumbest ideas ever", but that might be marketing misdirection. Because if there’s anyone positioned to pull it off, it’s him.
Nuclear Is The Only Real Option... for Now
Let’s get serious.
Nuclear is the only credible energy source for the AGI era. Here’s why:
Base-load power: Always-on, stable, weather-independent
Insane energy density: One uranium pellet = a ton of coal
Tiny land use: SMRs (small modular reactors) can power massive clusters with minimal space
Zero carbon: No emissions, no fossil dependency
And when it comes to nuclear… Musk’s record is clear:
@theallinpod Nuclear energy from a modern power plant design is extremely safe
— #Elon Musk (#@elonmusk)
7:11 PM • Oct 19, 2024
But nuclear isn’t scaling. Why?
The Real Bottlenecks
Regulatory Failure The NRC still thinks it’s 1979. Getting a permit takes a decade. No startup can wait that long. No VC will fund that risk curve.
Public Fear Fukushima broke the Overton window. Nuclear = danger in the public mind. Even clean SMRs get labeled as threats.
Supply Chain Rot The U.S. let its nuclear industrial base decay. We don’t have the engineers. We don’t have the manufacturing. We don’t enrich enough uranium. China does.
Investor Apathy Too slow. Too risky. Too much red tape. Everyone’s watching AI, no one wants to fund the grid.
Until these change, AGI has no food.
Orbital Power: The Backup Plan Musk Might Already Be Building
Could we go around Earth? Sure. It’s called space-based solar power (SBSP).
Put a solar array in orbit. Beam energy down via microwave. No night, no clouds, no intermittency.
Sounds perfect, but there are economic walls we haven't solved yet:
Launch costs are brutal
Maintenance is impossible
Beaming energy has military implications (death ray memes are real)
Political backlash will be massive
Efficiency is still bad
But Musk already owns the stack:
SpaceX: He doesn’t need NASA to launch orbital collectors
Starlink: Already running a precision-targeted beamforming network
Tesla/SolarCity: Ground-based battery and solar infrastructure
Musk is closer to the federal government than ever, literally BFF with President Trump. SpaceX is indispensable. Starlink is battlefield infrastructure. JD Vance, Peter Thiel’s protégé, is the VP. Thiel and Musk don’t just share ideology, they also share bets. The machinery of state is starting to sync with the Musk stack.
If AGI energy becomes a national security issue, and it wil, Musk can walk into the DoD and say: “I can beam solar anywhere on Earth. I’ve got the hardware, the network, and the launch cadence.”
That’s a Dyson Sphere prelude.
Kardashev Escalation: Musk’s Endgame?
Musk is openly thinking in Kardashev terms:
As we progress along the Kardashev Scale, energy harnessed on Earth will increase a hundredfold and will mostly be solar aka fusion aka starlight.
Then energy harnessed will increase perhaps a billionfold if we make it to Kardashev II, with space solar power, and another
— #Elon Musk (#@elonmusk)
8:43 AM • May 12, 2025
He’s not just trying to solve the AGI power bottleneck. He’s laying groundwork for a Type I civilization.
Everything he’s building fits:
SpaceX = Launch control
Starlink = Precision energy and data beaming
Tesla/SolarCity = Storage and terrestrial energy infrastructure
Neuralink / xAI = Interface and cognition
It’s more than a collection of companies. It’s a Dyson Stack. A vertically integrated, post-nation-state infrastructure monopoly with the capacity to power, network, and shape the cognition of billions, on Earth and in orbit.
He has the regulatory leverage, the cultural capital, and the institutional buy-in to attempt what no sovereign nation has: energy-dominant, orbital-ready civilization infrastructure.
How You Survive This Reality
I know this is a deviation from my usual themes about building product… but this is how this all affects you, the engineer, the unconnected builder dreaming of an exit big enough to provide for your family.
You don’t need a rocket. But you better start building like the world you know is ending. Because it kinda is.
Here's your survival stack:
Own the Interface Layer
Don’t chase models. Build cognitive interfaces that mediate trust, reasoning, and action.Own Distribution
Newsletters, niche networks, developer tribes. AI will be plentiful — trust won’t.Piggyback Scarcity
Help companies reduce compute, route inference, evaluate models. Infra without owning the data center.Build Tech Skills
Self-hosted AI. Local LLMs. Supabase, Terraform, Ollama. Know how to run without Google or AmazonControl Narrative
If you can explain the chaos, people will follow you through it.Pick Your Geography
Land. Water. Energy. Exit routes. The grid is fragile, and cities will ration compute.
AGI IS coming. Energy is one of the bottleneck, interfaces or reality filters as I call them are the new empires.
🧠 Poll for Builders, Founders, and Operators
I’ve been writing more about how the big players are quietly reshaping the future: Musk, Thiel, state-aligned infrastructure plays, and the energy bottlenecks behind AGI.