Everyone’s talking about artificial general intelligence (AGI) like it’s a math problem. Like if we just get the algorithms right, the whole world will change. But here’s the truth no one wants to face: AGI won’t fail because it’s dumb. It’ll fail because it’s hungry, and we can’t feed it.

This isn’t a software problem. It’s an energy crisis.

🧠 If this resonates, read my earlier piece: The AI Gold Rush Is Over where I explain why AGI is no longer a research problem, but a resource war

The Illusion of Infinite Compute

For the last decade, we’ve tricked ourselves. We treated compute like it was infinite. New chips every year, cloud credits handed out like candy, startups burning hundreds of GPU-hours on anime filters and chat apps.

But training GPT-4 took 1.3 gigawatt-hours. The same energy needed to power 1,000 homes for a month. That’s 1 model. 1 run. The subsidies will stop.

Now scale that to real-time AGI:

  • Millions of concurrent agents

  • 24/7 inference

  • Embedded cognition in homes, cars, offices, drones, factories

This is a national grid-scale demand. Thousands of GWh per month, per frontier model, running live.

GDP vs Reality

Zoom out. Here’s the macro picture:

  • GDP-to-debt ratios are collapsing across the developed world

  • Boomers are retiring

  • Fertility is crashing

  • Labor costs are soaring

  • Productivity is stagnant

We can’t tax our way out. We can’t inflate our way out. We can’t grow our way out.

The only thing that pencils out is non-human labor. Automation at scale. And fast.

This connects directly to the thesis I laid out before: AGI is an economic necessity. The system collapses without it.

But all that automation needs power. Real power.

Solar Isn’t Serious — Except Maybe for Elon

Let’s kill the dream gently. Solar is fine for homes, for daytime offsets, for feel-good ESG slides. But for powering AGI? It’s not enough.

  • Problem 1: Intermittency Solar gives you 5-6 good hours a day. AI workloads want 24/7 uptime. So now you need massive battery storage: expensive, inefficient, and highly dependent on rare earths.

  • Problem 2: Footprint Want to run a hyperscale cluster on solar? You need square kilometers of panels. That’s before batteries. You’re buying real estate, building new transmission lines, and praying for sun.

  • Problem 3: Energy Density Solar panels: ~200W per square meter. Nuclear is 1,000x that.

So unless you’re planning to cover Nevada in silicon, solar isn’t not enough.

And yet… Elon Musk has been bullish on solar since at least 2022. In his words:

Recently, he’s escalated:

And just last year, he revealed the real frame he’s operating from:

He’s not just thinking about solar farms. He’s thinking Dyson Sphere-adjacent.

Musk’s Texas Bigger Game

In fact, Musk has done the math. As he put it:

But not everyone agrees. Yann LeCun, one of Musk’s most vocal critics, fired back:

The irony is that Musk is in the business of solving that exact problem. Batteries. Lots of them. He’s not hand-waving storage away: he’s quietly building the supply chain to close that gap.

Whatever delivers reliable, scalable energy fastest wins. Whether it’s fusion in orbit or uranium underground.

Musk says you can power the U.S. with solar in a small corner of Texas. And he’s not wrong, on paper.

Yes, the math works. 10,000 square miles of panels could technically generate enough electricity.

But Musk’s model is handwaving the real world:

  • Transmission is broken. The U.S. grid can’t move that power coast to coast.

  • Storage isn’t solved. Battery tech isn’t even close to what’s needed.

  • Uptime matters. AGI workloads don’t tolerate variance.

  • Land use and cooling are nightmares. Solar doesn’t help with thermal overhead.

It’s a fantasy built for spreadsheets, unless Musk knows something we don’t. Maybe he does.

He’s publicly called space-based solar power (SBSP) "one of the dumbest ideas ever", but that might be marketing misdirection. Because if there’s anyone positioned to pull it off, it’s him.

Nuclear Is The Only Real Option... for Now

Let’s get serious.

Nuclear is the only credible energy source for the AGI era. Here’s why:

  • Base-load power: Always-on, stable, weather-independent

  • Insane energy density: One uranium pellet = a ton of coal

  • Tiny land use: SMRs (small modular reactors) can power massive clusters with minimal space

  • Zero carbon: No emissions, no fossil dependency

And when it comes to nuclear… Musk’s record is clear:

But nuclear isn’t scaling. Why?

The Real Bottlenecks

  • Regulatory Failure The NRC still thinks it’s 1979. Getting a permit takes a decade. No startup can wait that long. No VC will fund that risk curve.

  • Public Fear Fukushima broke the Overton window. Nuclear = danger in the public mind. Even clean SMRs get labeled as threats.

  • Supply Chain Rot The U.S. let its nuclear industrial base decay. We don’t have the engineers. We don’t have the manufacturing. We don’t enrich enough uranium. China does.

  • Investor Apathy Too slow. Too risky. Too much red tape. Everyone’s watching AI, no one wants to fund the grid.

Until these change, AGI has no food.

Orbital Power: The Backup Plan Musk Might Already Be Building

Could we go around Earth? Sure. It’s called space-based solar power (SBSP).

Put a solar array in orbit. Beam energy down via microwave. No night, no clouds, no intermittency.

Sounds perfect, but there are economic walls we haven't solved yet:

  • Launch costs are brutal

  • Maintenance is impossible

  • Beaming energy has military implications (death ray memes are real)

  • Political backlash will be massive

  • Efficiency is still bad

But Musk already owns the stack:

  • SpaceX: He doesn’t need NASA to launch orbital collectors

  • Starlink: Already running a precision-targeted beamforming network

  • Tesla/SolarCity: Ground-based battery and solar infrastructure

Musk is closer to the federal government than ever, literally BFF with President Trump. SpaceX is indispensable. Starlink is battlefield infrastructure. JD Vance, Peter Thiel’s protégé, is the VP. Thiel and Musk don’t just share ideology, they also share bets. The machinery of state is starting to sync with the Musk stack.

If AGI energy becomes a national security issue, and it wil, Musk can walk into the DoD and say: “I can beam solar anywhere on Earth. I’ve got the hardware, the network, and the launch cadence.”

That’s a Dyson Sphere prelude.

Kardashev Escalation: Musk’s Endgame?

Musk is openly thinking in Kardashev terms:

He’s not just trying to solve the AGI power bottleneck. He’s laying groundwork for a Type I civilization.

Everything he’s building fits:

  • SpaceX = Launch control

  • Starlink = Precision energy and data beaming

  • Tesla/SolarCity = Storage and terrestrial energy infrastructure

  • Neuralink / xAI = Interface and cognition

It’s more than a collection of companies. It’s a Dyson Stack. A vertically integrated, post-nation-state infrastructure monopoly with the capacity to power, network, and shape the cognition of billions, on Earth and in orbit.

He has the regulatory leverage, the cultural capital, and the institutional buy-in to attempt what no sovereign nation has: energy-dominant, orbital-ready civilization infrastructure.

How You Survive This Reality

I know this is a deviation from my usual themes about building product… but this is how this all affects you, the engineer, the unconnected builder dreaming of an exit big enough to provide for your family.

You don’t need a rocket. But you better start building like the world you know is ending. Because it kinda is.

Here's your survival stack:

  1. Own the Interface Layer
    Don’t chase models. Build cognitive interfaces that mediate trust, reasoning, and action.

  2. Own Distribution
    Newsletters, niche networks, developer tribes. AI will be plentiful — trust won’t.

  3. Piggyback Scarcity
    Help companies reduce compute, route inference, evaluate models. Infra without owning the data center.

  4. Build Tech Skills
    Self-hosted AI. Local LLMs. Supabase, Terraform, Ollama. Know how to run without Google or Amazon

  5. Control Narrative
    If you can explain the chaos, people will follow you through it.

  6. Pick Your Geography
    Land. Water. Energy. Exit routes. The grid is fragile, and cities will ration compute.

AGI IS coming. Energy is one of the bottleneck, interfaces or reality filters as I call them are the new empires.

🧠 Poll for Builders, Founders, and Operators
I’ve been writing more about how the big players are quietly reshaping the future: Musk, Thiel, state-aligned infrastructure plays, and the energy bottlenecks behind AGI.

Do you want more of this style?

More opinionated breakdowns grounded in real moves, data, and how to position yourself when you are not a billionaire with a rocket?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found